When choosing a Professional Employer Organization (PEO) model, businesses must weigh a multitude of factors, including cost, user experience, scalability, and the unique demands of their industry.
Here, we'll explore the cost implications and other nuances associated with Service-First and Technology-First PEO models.
The Service-First PEO Model
Emphasizes personalized service and human interaction.
Prioritizes the human aspect of HR, addressing intricate concerns through human dialogue. Direct email, phone, or onsite meeting.
Typically more expensive due to the high-touch, bespoke nature of the service.
Costs range from $100 to $300 per employee per month.
When is it Suitable?
If you envision a representative coming to your warehouse, clad in safety gear and equipped with a checklist, only a service-first company will suffice.
If in-person open enrollment meetings are a non-negotiable requirement for your company, you should lean towards a service-first PEO.
What is a Service-First Company?
They will assign an HR Business Partner (HRBP) to your account.
They prioritize onsite or in-person interactions, such as attending open enrollment meetings, safety walkthroughs, and quarterly check-ins.
The Technology-First PEO Model
Focuses on providing technological solutions for HR management.
Emphasizes workflow automation, self-service, and standardization of process.
Generally more affordable due to its emphasis on automation and standardized solutions.
Costs typically lie between $55 and $120 per employee per month, which amounts to almost 33% to 50% of the cost of service-based PEO providers.
When is it Not Suitable?
If your expectation is a high degree of personalized, on-site service.
Businesses lacking in tech-savviness or infrastructure where employees do not have easy access to mobile phones, the internet, or computers.
What is a Technology-First Company?
Their primary aim is to make HR processes so intuitive that in-person interactions are redundant, saving both time and money.
They offer competitive pricing, often 30% to 50% cheaper in terms of administrative fees for PEO/ ASO services.
Their service model revolves around APIs and system workflows, enabling automation of routine tasks associated with the employee lifecycle.
Who Benefits Most from a Tech-First Company?
Experienced HR professionals overseeing a growing workforce but with budgetary constraints on hiring more HR administrators.
Senior executives such as CFOs and COOs, especially in tech companies, who prioritize operational streamlining.
HR Consultants advising multiple clients, appreciating the ease and scalability of the platform.
Who Might Struggle?
Less experienced HR professionals; without a clear understanding of HR problems, the technology can sometimes amplify these issues.
Individuals who are not tech-savvy.
In scenarios where open enrollments are manually done and then transposed to a tech platform, it can result in errors. This not only frustrates both parties but can compromise the liability protection typically provided by a PEO.
The decision between a Service-First and Technology-First PEO model goes beyond cost; it's about alignment with a company's operational culture, technological readiness, and HR demands.
By meticulously evaluating both models and understanding their implications, businesses can select a PEO model that seamlessly integrates with their operations and provides maximal value.
🙋 Want a FREE Employee Benefits Strategy Session?
Click Here 👉 https://www.thinqinsurance.com/employee-benefits-strategy-session
🔴 Get Your Business Insurance Quote
Click Here 👉 https://www.thinqinsurance.com/business-insurance-quote
Connect with me LinkedIn